<<
Previous ||
Next >>
Streets in the sky – Towards improving the quality
of life in Tower Blocks in the UK
Executive Summary
This report was prepared for the National Sustainable
Tower Blocks Initiative, an informal grouping of voluntary organisations.
The Initiative is seeking to discover and implement ways to make Tower
Blocks more sustainable places to live.
There are over 4,000 tower blocks, homes for perhaps 800,000 people.
The Government forecasts that 4.4 million new households may form in
England by 2016, and there is severe pressure resisting further building
on green-field sites.
The problems
Tower blocks face many problems, most of which relate to all poorly-maintained
social housing. Some relate to physical conditions; others to management
and allocations policy issues. Image is often a draw-back and services
provision a consistent problem. So tower blocks are often seen as problems
rather than resources. The majority of tower blocks are owned by local
authorities, who in many cases favour demolition. A number are now run
by housing associations, and this will increase markedly in the next
few years. If conditions are to improve, the physical environment and
social qualities of the community must move forward together. While
negative perceptions are commonplace, they are by no means universal,
and many residents are proud of where they live.
Tower block accommodation is not suitable for families with children.
This leaves two main options: young people without children, and middle-aged
or elderly people. In general it is possible to make tower blocks cater
successfully for these groups. They can be particularly popular with
elderly people, if a high standard of security is maintained.
Demolition may be the best option if the block is structurally unsound,
or deeply mired in social problems. Refurbishment is the alternative,
and there have been many innovative approaches. Reducing the numbers
of families with children in tower blocks will have a long-term bearing
upon the community that develops. Implications, for service providers
and residents, must be addressed.
Potential of Tower Blocks
An integrated approach is necessary for improvements, through
long-term community development;
provision of quality services; and
physical improvements.
Tower blocks have some advantages for developing sustainability:
they allow housing needs to be met while minimising land use;
they can provide security
they can leave a smaller ecological footprint;
they form a self-defined unit for economic opportunities;
common systems can have anti-poverty benefits;
and, of course, there is the view.
Towards sustainable development
Refurbishment can cost up to £5 million, whereas demolition may
cost around a tenth of that. Finance is usually easier for new-build.
Demolition means new houses, usually requiring more land.
The development of more sustainable tower blocks will need:
Suitable Funding systems;
To strengthen incentives to tackle problems in tower blocks rather than
knocking them down;
An appropriate allocations policy and a stable population.
One which admits people who are suited to, and content with, tower block
living.
Effective security systems
Better social space and surroundings
Effective community democracy
There are a number of different ways in which residents can participate
Adequate service provision
The form of tenant organisation will have a great bearing on the way
services are provided.
Support for change is needed at many points. This could come from the
landlord; from regeneration partnerships; or from NGOs. Agencies may
need education and capacity-building to develop a culture and approach
which supports community democracy.
Conclusions and Recommendations for Action
Adequate security systems are fundamental to the success of tower
blocks as good places to live.
Effective and accountable tenant and neighbourhood-level management
is also a fundamental building-block for change and improvement.
Given adequate security, effective management, and an allocations
policy that helps build a stable and suitable population, there is no
reason why most structurally-sound tower blocks should not become attractive
places to live.
High-rise housing has a role to play in regenerating our cities.
We would therefore recommend that there should be no further demolition
of inner-city high-rise buildings until there has been, for each block,
a full assessment of the alternative options for refurbishment.
It is not likely or realistic that all blocks with problems will
be demolished in the near future. There is a clear case for a more strategic
approach to refurbishment, and this should be designed to increase local
sustainability.
The Government should recognise the potential value of tower
blocks, develop a clear policy, and review current financing mechanisms.
Local authorities and regeneration agencies should recognise
the potential of these assets and establish more sustainable management
practices.
The development of a national network of tower block residents
groups should be encouraged and supported.
A more positive image of tower blocks could be encouraged with,
say, a National Tower Block Day.
High-density inner-city housing is likely to become a priority over
the next ten years, both for young professionals and older people. Use
of the best available refurbishment techniques alongside community development
would show that there is a lot more that can be done with Britains
high-rise stock.