Appendix 2 The process of change From our observations and from assessing case studies,
there are key common elements in any process of improvement and development.
Any attempt to redevelop tower blocks should consider this process carefully. 1. The Catalyst: This is the grain of sand in the oyster
shell around which a pearl begins to form. It may be an event, or a
crisis or threat of some sort. It is outside the control of outside
agencies what residents choose to respond to; but an attempt can be
made to engineer a catalyst, for instance through aspects of a regeneration
programme which need the involvement of residents. 2. Social interaction and the emergence of active individuals:
The initial catalysts leads to an increase in the intensity and sense
of purpose in the social relationships among residents; and the emergence
of a few residents with the time, energy and commitment to play a bigger
role in the life of the block. The qualities of individuals are vital,
and include determination and commitment. This crucial social dynamic
can only come from within the block, but it can be assisted by the steps
listed above allocations, security, community space. 3. Organisation: Residents need to develop an accountable
structure through which to express their priorities and channel and
co-ordinate their activity. All the usual human difficulties of stubborn
disagreements, sensitive egos, and personality clashes can, of course,
arise. New tenants groups can be particularly prone to such problems
because the issues at stake are, literally, so close to home; and many
members will have felt frustrated and powerless for a long time. In
this context the more active individuals may feel very possessive of
their new roles, and resentments can arise from the fact that different
people invest very different levels of time and effort in the group.
Good accountability mechanisms, appropriate training, outside advice,
and, if it comes to it, some help with mediation are all likely to be
required. 4. Priorities: If they are to make a difference on any
issue residents need to be able to agree on where to concentrate their
efforts. Outside agencies seeking to support them need to accept their
choice. This is a key underpinning of sustainability, since for a project
to survive in the long term resident commitment is what counts (8). 5. Help from outside: Assistance is also needed in resources,
advice, training, and encouragement. Residents groups need allies, they
also need to see that they are not the only ones in the world doing
what they are trying to do organising a visit to another estate
can inspire and increase confidence. Outside agencies must perform a
balancing act providing support, even at times showing the way,
but hanging back from doing everything for the group. Handing them everything
on a plate does nothing for the residents sense of responsibility
and self-respect, and destroys the prospects for sustainability. Nothing
does more for the confidence of a community group than winning its own
battles. That notwithstanding, agencies should accept an obligation
to take a lead from residents, and not to be obstructive (25). 6. Success: If this process unfolds and leads to a first, albeit small, success for the residents, then their confidence and ambition will swell to tackle other projects and priorities.
|
|
||
|
|